I Get to Rant About Avatar, Too
I didn’t want to watch Avatar. I knew I wasn’t going to like it. But too many people insisted I should, and I can’t properly criticize something I haven’t seen, anyway. And I must admit, there were aspects about it that I greatly enjoyed. Very rarely these days can visual effects be truthfully referred to as “groundbreaking,” but Avatar earns that compliment and then some. This film is the future of computer animation in cinema. It’s majestic to watch.
Visually, I mean. The story pisses me off.
This has already been pointed out more than once, but I have to say it in my own voice. Anyone who thinks this movie is a credit to Native American cultural portrayals is failing to grasp what it’s really about. I have no tolerance for Noble Savage bullshit, and neither should anyone else. In this day and age, the person who creates it usually means well by it, and so everyone joins in the cheering and people don’t realize that it’s just another form of dehumanization. But Avatar isn’t just a story about perfect people with a perfect culture, who sing with all the voices of the mountain and paint with all the colors of the wind, oh no. Enter the Essential White Hero, who will of course become their greatest warrior and wed the Chief’s Daughter and BLAH BLAH BLAH, even though he’s presumably never heard the wolf cry to the blue corn moon or anything. This guy is a device to assuage the guilt of white people, and absolutely nothing more than that.

Have no fear, woodland creatures!
My problems with the script aren’t all ideological. Simply speaking to strength of narrative, this film had sucky characters (“sucky” being the professional term describing characters whose personalities consist only of a single trait, if that). Our hero appears to have no connection to humanity whatsoever, even though he’s, like, 26 and has presumably kissed someone and shared a candy bar with someone and played Mario Kart with someone and otherwise been privy to the nicer bits of the human race. This isn’t a Last of the Mohicans scenario, where the man has been raised by the natives and sees them as his family. He just literally stumbles into their world and is not only able to sever his previous identity without any difficulty, but will later become the perfect embodiment of their cultural ideal. Yeah, right.
The other characters are even worse. The Na’vi are a collection of various stereotypes, even down to the Young Brave who is already betrothed to the Chief’s Daughter, hates our white protagonist at first, finally recognizes him as his brother and leader, then dies valiantly in battle. You know, the guy who was probably supposed to be the actual hero of his people, but gets shunted aside to make room for a clumsy, clueless outsider, because we’re really more comfortable if the white guy does it. Then there’s Sigourney Weaver’s character, whose motivations are all over the map and whose sole purpose is to die, a collection of human buddies who are also only dimly defined, and a smattering of bad guys (pictured below) who I actually have no complaints about. Subtlety is the watchword here.

The script was obviously afraid that we’d have no idea what the movie was trying to tell us unless it held our hand the entire way, which is annoying in and of itself. But what got to me the most was that precisely zero of the human characters acted like humans. I’ve already mentioned how the hero appeared to have been raised in a sensory deprivation chamber judging by the emotional bonds he displayed towards the civilization that birthed him, bonds that, if possessed, might have actually created some tension for his character. The rest of the cast does no better–-the character played by Michelle Rodriguez, who understandably chokes when asked to commit genocide, later turns on the humans and kills dozens of them before going down. She’s a hardened marine, and many of these people were presumably her friends, whom she was willing to die beside the previous day. I just can’t buy her conflict-free turnaround. Finally, the part that really had me groaning was the very end, in which most of the remaining humans were herded onto their ships to return to Earth, never to be seen again. They will never, ever return to bother the Na’vi or bombard their planet with nuclear weapons against which they would have no defense, because it’s not like persistence is a major part of human nature or anything. We are, in fact, known galaxy-wide for our gracious acceptance of defeat.

I'm going home now.
All sarcasm aside, it’s true that there should only be one possible outcome to this plot: the flaming death of all the Na’vi. In many ways, that would actually be fitting. After all, the thing that makes white people’s history with Native Americans tragic, poignant and emotionally distressing is the fact that we succeeded in destroying them. That this movie insists on depicting a highly contrived victory, all made possible by a converted white dude no less, is just insult heaped upon insult. Avatar is not an homage to the beauty of Native American culture, but a white boy fantasy of living without guilt. Nobody should be inspired by this.
Look, I understand the desire to make the white guilt go away forever. I struggle with it myself. But indulging in daydreams about pure absolution, assimilation and acceptance into ethnic culture that is more than just acceptance, but complete and utter vindication: all this is a lie. The world isn’t fair, and if Native Americans have to watch their own culture slowly fade to nothing after centuries of abuse, then we can handle a little white guilt. We certainly aren’t going to redeem ourselves through pretending that we can just cast it off like an old, hole-ridden shirt because hey, we’re the best! We’ve got to accept this part of ourselves, because it will always be there. Life goes on, guys.

YOU TELL ‘EM, EMILY!!!! Lol, in all seriousness, I enjoyed the film mostly because it was Pocahontas on an epic scale (and we all know how I love that movie). You just had to use the lyrics, didn’t you?
Well, you know, we are all connected to each other. In a circle, in a hoop that never ends.
Brilliant, Holmes! Even the 3D in this movie is annoying to me because its so good — and it was so profitable. You can kiss creative cinematography goodbye, people. This 3D shit is about to be abused for all its worth in every “visual” oriented film from now on. Just when I thought art direction was making a comeback…
Well, it did cost them about a gazillion dollars to do it well, and there are other factors in Avatar’s profitability. My guess is that the 3D craze still won’t lead to measurable gains for most of the films it’s used to make, so it’ll probably die down despite this success.
I was actually far, far more impressed by the computer animation, and how seamlessly it blended in with the live action. This actually excites me, because it can lead to far more fantasy and sci-fi films in the future, which are my faves.
As much as this rant makes logical sense, I can’t help but disagree. I didn’t feel like any historical guilt had been lifted after watching the movie, and I’m sure if anyone left the theatre thinking “yeah, a white guy DID save the natives”, then I doubt that’s the fault of the film. I thought it served its purpose in reminding us of past (and present) crimes, though mostly to those who prefer not to think about it on a regular basis. The direction to give the story a happy ending was certainly for our benefit, but it didn’t detract from the moral.
It might have been a little cheap to make the heroic ‘white guy’ save the day, sure, but offering an alternative seems like a much better use of art than just pointing out well-known flaws. When you insult people, they never listen, you have to make them feel good about themselves first. In order to have guilt, you have to understand your wrongdoing, and this movie seemed more about understanding the guilt instead of relinquishing it.
The main character didn’t strike me as some noble white-knight either; he exploited the na’vi at the beginning, but later came to understand his wrongdoing. It wasn’t his ‘goodness’, but his guilt that saved the na’vi. Guilt is the hero of this movie, and if we had more of that before we oppressed native culture, maybe things would be different.
Also, I don’t think turning on a mercenary company of soldiers represents turning on your whole species. Jake Sully and Rodriguez’s character don’t side against the whole human race, they side against a bunch of jarheads who are only there for the money. There’s much less weight on your conscience when you’re shooting at soldiers who have chosen to be there, especially when you’ve already been murdering/exploiting the natives.
I know, I know, I should have just written my own damn blog instead of harassing yours, but alas I am much less educated and credible. Interesting read nonetheless.
I wouldn’t honestly worry about being educated and credible. This is the Internet! You can spell, and that’s good enough for me. I’m just pleased to have people who aren’t my mom caring enough to make comments on my blog. And anyway, I don’t consider disagreeing with my point of view to be harassment.
I did get pretty frothy in my rant up there, but as you might have guessed, I have strong personal feelings about this issue. I lived on a reservation for many of my formative years, and I have just as much of an aversion to portrayals of Native American culture as being “perfect” as I do to white dudes saving the day for a group of minorities, which unfortunately were both present in this film.
In any event, this page is already filled with my opinions, so thank you for presenting the other side of the argument on Avatar. I don’t think I’m ever going to like the movie, and subjectively I also don’t believe that it was a very well-told story in terms of technique. But at the same time I know I’m not Captain Genius of the World, so I don’t judge others for loving it. Heck, my best friend is quite a fan.